The Technicast is back! Nathan Taylor of Technica Editorial gives an overview of and the latest update on Plan S as it continues to change the landscape of the publishing industry.
What do you think of Plan S? And what steps are you and your journal taking to prepare for its implementation? Let us know in the comment section below!
Peer review is one of the cornerstones of scholarly publishing. Before research is accepted for publication, experts must assess its quality, originality, methodology, significance, and contribution to the field. Depending on the publisher or the subject matter,...
Let’s talk about reviewer invitations. If you have spent any time working with scholarly journals and peer review lately, the following may sound very familiar to you. An email arrives from a journal you barely recognize. The greeting feels generic. The manuscript is...
Readers no longer want to know only your books. They want to know you. While an author’s main occupation is writing and publishing books, the books themselves should not be the only way authors engage with their readers. Authors should also visibly, directly engage...
At Technica Editorial, we believe that great teams cannot function in silos, which is why every member of our staff is cross-trained in editorial support and production. We train our employees from the ground up so they can see how each role fits into the larger publishing process. This strategy means Technica is uniquely positioned to identify opportunities to improve and streamline your workflow. Because we invest in creating leaders, you get more than remote support — you get a partner.